Alex Beaudin
← All writing

May 26, 2026

Probability Triples

Notes from Rosenthal Chapter II

A probability triple is just a measure space where μ(X)=1\mu(\mathcal{X}) = 1.

Looking at this, it’s not at all obvious whether or not a probability triple exists or how to construct one for a given Ω\Omega. However, we’ll unpack the definition and get some insights on constructing triples when possible or proving their existence. In particular, we can always define a triple for a finite or countable set.

An important characteristic of finite sets is the trivial existence of a σ\sigma-algebra F\mathcal{F}. How do we construct valid σ\sigma-algebras when we don’t have ‘discrete’ sets?

Ok, well a semialgebra might be quite easy to define. Can we generate a σ\sigma-algebra from a semialgebra? Consider the first attempt

B0={all finite unions of elements of J}.(1)\htmlId{eq-1}{\mathcal{B}_0 = \{ \text{all finite unions of elements of } \mathcal{J}\}.} \tag{1}

Unfortunately, B0\mathcal{B}_0 is not a σ\sigma-algebra.

There is a further problem that of closure under complements, which means that extending B0\mathcal{B}_0 to include countable unions would not make it a σ\sigma-algebra. In particular, the complement of the set we described has to be in any σ\sigma-algebra containing J\mathcal{J}, which is the set of irrationals in [0,1][0, 1]. No countable union of intervals can produce this set.

Extension Theorems

Ok, so then how do we get a σ\sigma-algebra? We could just take the closure of the semialgebra with respect to the operations necessary for a σ\sigma-algebra. However, we’d often run into a problem with our measure not being sub-additive. In the example above, we’d reintroduce the sets which cause the measure not to be sub-additive!